Federal Tax Cut Plan Relies
on a Surplus That Does Not Exist
This spring, the Congressional Budget Office predicted a $996 billion surplus in
the non-Social Security part of the budget over the next ten years. However, the
surplus will only occur if all discretionary programs (including defense) are
cut by 15% adjusted for inflation or by 23% as a share of the economy.
(Sometimes the size of the federal surplus is described as over $3 trillion, but
$1.9 trillion is Social Security reserves, which policymakers have agreed is
"off limits.") Allowing defense spending to grow only with inflation
and adjusting domestic spending only for inflation and population growth would
produce a surplus of $224 billion - 78% less than the CBO's projections. Using
more realistic assumptions, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities predicted
a surplus of $112 billion.
At the time the surplus was predicted, it was difficult to believe that such
cuts in spending could be achieved, even if it were desirable to do so. Recent
decisions by Congress have made it nearly impossible for any surplus to
materialize. Congress is having a difficult time living within budget caps, and
has engaged in a number of accounting tricks, including:
- Classifying $11.4 billion in outlays as "emergency spending"
that doesn't have to fit under the cap, including such predictable items as
the 2000 census.
- Using $16.4 billion in "scorecard adjustments" - intentional
underestimates of the cost of appropriations bills - to keep this amount
from counting toward the budget caps.
On July 1, the Congressional Budget Office revised its numbers, taking all
bookkeeping gimmicks into account, changing a $14 billion surplus for 2000 into
a deficit of over $3 billion. When actions since July 1 are added, the deficit
for 2000 alone rises to $17 billion.
One disturbing element is the type of programs that are targeted to make up
for budget shortfalls.
- The House of Representatives is reconsidering welfare block grants to the
states, and especially the $4.2 billion that has been appropriated but not
yet spent by the states. Many states consider these unspent dollars as
"rainy day" funds they are saving for future hard times.
- The House appropriation committee's allocation for VA-HUD eliminates
funding for Section 8 housing vouchers and cuts public housing by over $500
million.
- Billions of dollars in funding needed for the Labor, Health and Human
Services appropriations bill has already been transferred to other bills.
What's left would require a 34% reduction in appropriations for programs
covered under the bill. Such a possibility is so unacceptable that Congress
hasn't been able to take action on the bill.
August 19, 1999
Resource Links:
Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, http://www.cbpp.org
Citizens for Tax Justice, http://www.ctj.org
|