House Omnibus 2001 Tax Bill
The
House of Representatives has released their omnibus tax bill, HF 2498, which
provides $1.56 billion in tax relief in the 2002-03 biennium. This summary is intended to give an overview
of the major components of the bill and to highlight items with an impact on
low- and moderate-income families and nonprofit organizations. A detailed
summary is available from
House
Research and a spreadsheet is available from
House
Fiscal Analysis.
Sales Tax
Rebate
The House proposes an $856 million Sales Tax
Rebate, similar to the 2000 rebate. The
rebate is calculated using a schedule based on filing status and taxable income
and ranges from $237 to $3,250 for married filing jointly and head-of-household
filers and from $120 to $1,625 for other filers.
To
receive a rebate based on the rebate schedule, the taxpayer must have filed a
1999 Minnesota income tax return by November 20, 2001 and had at least $1 of
tax liability, and not be a dependent.
The
following groups of persons will also receive rebates, but not calculated on
the rebate schedule:
- Dependents age 18 or older with wage
income will receive 35% of the rebate amount for non-dependents of the same
income level.
- Recipients of social security, railroad
retirement benefits, or a public pension will receive a rebate of $120 (does
not include dependents).
- Persons who filed a 1999 Minnesota income
tax return to receive a refund of withholding or to claim a refundable credit
but did not have tax liability, or filed for a 1999 Minnesota property tax
refund, will receive the minimum rebate amount for their filing status (does
not include dependents).
- Non-residents who paid at least $10 in
Minnesota sales tax on non-business purchases can apply for a rebate of 41.25%
of the sales tax paid. This rebate
cannot exceed the amount a Minnesota resident of the same income level would
receive.
The
bill allows rebate recipients to donate their rebate to the following purposes:
basic sliding fee child care, K-12 education, affordable rental housing,
contaminated site cleanup, transit/highway funding, University of
Minnesota/Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, and nursing homes.
This
proposal differs from past rebates in that it does not wait to calculate the
total amount of the rebate based on the actual size of the surplus when the
state “closes the books” on June 30, 2001.
Instead it uses the surplus amount determined in the February forecast,
even though the actual surplus may be smaller.
Property Taxes
and Local Government Aid
The
major component of the bill is property tax reform and relief, containing a net $688
million in relief in the 2002-03 biennium.
Some of the highlights are:
- Elimination of the state-determined
general education levy. The general
education levy is a portion of education funding that is determined by the
state but collected on local property taxes.
- Agricultural and cabin properties are
exempted from school referendum levies.
- A statewide general property tax is
levied on commercial/industrial and cabin properties only. The tax will collect
$430 million in Fiscal Year 2003,
and will be adjusted each following year for inflation. This tax is gradually converted over time to
be a tax on the value of the land only (excluding the value of buildings).
- A dedicated fund for transit is
created. 19.5% of the revenues
collected from the sales tax on motor vehicles are dedicated to the transit
fund. These revenues replace the
property tax as a funding source for transit.
These
changes are accompanied by considerable class rate changes. Class rates describe what percentage of a
property’s value is subject to property tax.
Classes are based on the property’s usage. The table below lists the proposed changes to class rates, as
well as the effective tax rate, which is the amount of tax as a percentage of
property value. (These class rates do
not apply to the statewide general property tax levy on businesses and cabins.)
|
|
Class Rate
|
Statewide Average
Effective Tax Rate (2002)
|
|
Current
|
Proposed
|
Current
|
Proposed
|
|
Residential
Homestead
|
|
|
1.35% |
1.12%
|
|
Value Less than $76,000
|
1%
|
1%
|
|
|
|
Value over $76,000
|
1.65%
|
|
|
|
Disabled
Homestead
|
0.45%
|
0.45%
|
|
|
|
Residential
Non-homestead
|
|
|
1.7%
|
1.51%
|
|
Value Less than $76,000
|
1.2%
|
1%
|
|
|
|
Value over $76,000
|
1.65%
|
1.5%
in 2002
1.25%
in 2003
1%
in 2004
|
|
|
|
Multifamily
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
2-3 Units
|
1.65%
|
1.5%
in 2002
1.25%
in 2003
1%
in 2004
|
2.08%
|
1.93%
|
|
4 or more units
|
2.4%
|
2.95%
|
1.99%
|
|
Small City 4 or more units
|
2.15%
|
|
|
|
Low Income (4D) Apartments
|
1%
|
0.9% in 2002
0.95% in 2003
1% in 2004; new construction 1%
|
1.37%
|
1.26%
|
|
Seasonal
Recreational
|
|
|
1.47%
|
1.27%
|
|
Value Less than $76,000
|
1.2%
|
1%
|
|
|
|
Value over $76,000
|
1.65%
|
|
|
|
Commercial/Industrial
|
|
|
4.04%
|
3.45%
|
|
Value under $150,000
|
2.4% |
1.5% |
3.14%
|
2.73% |
|
Value $150,000 to $200,000
|
3.4%
|
4.22%
|
|
Value over $200,000
|
2%
|
3.59%
|
|
Electric Generation Machinery
|
3.4%
|
1.5%
|
4.13%
|
2.09%
|
|
Farm Land – Homestead
|
|
|
1.12% House
0.63% Land |
0.91% House
0.46% Land |
|
Value under $115,000
|
0.35%
|
0.55%
|
|
|
|
Value $115,000 -
$600,000
|
0.8%
|
|
|
|
Value over $600,000
|
1.2%
|
1%
|
|
|
|
Farm –
Non-homestead
|
1.2%
|
1%
|
1.19%
|
1%
|
Source: House Research
An
additional change in the property tax area is to increase the maximum credit
for low- and middle-income homeowners under the Property Tax Refund program
(also called the Circuit Breaker.) The
new maximum would be $1,190, nearly double its current level. For renters receiving the Property Tax
Refund (also called Renters’ Credit), the bill is less positive. The bill directs the Department of Revenue
to conduct a study to determine what percentage of rent should be considered to
be the renter’s share of property taxes for the purposes of calculating the
refund. The percentage would be
adjusted based on the study for Renters’ Credits starting in 2003. Most evidence suggests that the new percentage
will be lower than its current value of 19%, given that rents have grown more
quickly than property taxes over time, and therefore property taxes make up a
smaller portion of total rent.
In
conjunction with these property tax changes, the bill makes a number of changes
to aid programs to local governments, including the largest programs, HACA and
Local Government Aid (LGA). The bill
provides for the state takeover of 30% of the non-federal share of county
out-of-home placement costs and the costs of district court administration and
mandated court services in those judicial districts where these costs have not
already been assumed. County HACA is
reduced to offset this change.
The
bill provides that for counties and cities over 2,500 population, there can be
a “reverse referenda” in which the voters can challenge any property tax levy
increase.
Income Taxes
The
bill contains relatively small amounts of income tax changes, with a $165
million reduction in corporate taxes (mainly through a move towards a
single-sales factor), and $90 million in individual income tax changes in the
2002-03 biennium. In addition, the bill
would appropriate $150,000 for the biennium for grants to nonprofits providing
volunteer tax assistance to low-income and disadvantaged taxpayers.
The
changes in the individual income tax relate to credits and subtractions. Subtractions reduce the amount of income
subject to Minnesota tax, while credits reduce the amount of tax paid. Subtractions include:
- Active duty military pay for persons stationed outside Minnesota
- The first $3,000 of military pay (including
for Reserves and National Guard)
- The non-itemizer deduction for charitable
contributions is increased from 50% to 100% of total contributions exceeding
$500.
- Capital gains exclusion of 50% for
certain investments held at least five years.
Subtractions
do not provide any benefit to families without state tax liability. In 2000, a Minnesota family of four would
need income of $26,800 to owe any state tax liability, a family of three would
need income of $25,600.[1]
Credit
changes include:
- Marriage penalty relief in the Working
Family Credit and Dependent Care Credit.
- The Dependent Care Credit can cover
dependents up to age 15, rather than up to age 13 as under current law.
- The maximum amount of K-12 education
credit would be $1,000 times the total number of children in the family (rather
than the current maximum of $2,000 for families with two or more
children). The phase out is also
adjusted, allowing families to be eligible at a higher income level than under current
law (current maximum income is $37,500).
Allowable expenses for the K-12 credit are expanded to include purchase
of musical instruments and extracurricular activity fees paid to schools.
- A new, non-refundable credit would be
created for donation of land for conservation.
The credit would equal 50% of the fair market value of the land donated.
Sales Tax
The
House tax bill does not include the Governor’s suggestions to expand the sales
tax to services and lower the rate.
This section of the bill would provide $194 million in reduced sales
taxes in 2002-03. The largest portion
of the cost, $154 million, is a one-time expense related to eliminating a
provision whereby retailers must submit their June sales tax payments one month
early, which moves these revenues from one fiscal year to the next.
The
remainder of the sales tax provisions deal with exemptions of various types of
products, including energy-efficient equipment and alternative fuel
vehicles.
The
bill also makes a number of definitional and process changes so that the state
is in compliance with the Streamlined Sales Tax, a national effort that may
enable the states to eventually begin collecting the sales tax that is due on
internet and catalog sales.
Taxes on
Nonprofit Organizations
The
Governor proposed a number of proposals that would have directly affected the
tax-exempt status of nonprofits in his tax reform proposal.[2] There are no significant changes to
nonprofits’ tax status in the House omnibus bill. Some small provisions relating to nonprofits include:
- The bill tightens up the current sales
tax exemption for tickets to arts events to limit the exemption to events truly
put on by nonprofit arts organizations.
- The bill also clarifies that fundraising
sales for combined campaigns are not taxable (i.e., a company that sells
cookbooks to their employees to raise money for United Way would not have to
collect sales tax on the cookbooks.)
- The bill exempts from property taxes up
to $100,000 of land value for a 501(c)(3) organization that is an agricultural
historical society whose primary purpose is to acquire, preserve, restore, and
exhibit artifacts and other items useful in understanding local or regional
agricultural history.
The
bill reduces gambling taxes, which would benefit nonprofits engaged in
charitable gaming.
Health Care
Taxes
The
House omnibus bill would repeal the MinnesotaCare provider tax, the 1% premium
tax on nonprofit health plans, and 2% premiums tax on indemnity health
insurance. Health plans must pass on
the savings from these tax reductions to consumers.
To
replace this funding source, the 2002 one-time tobacco settlement funds,
portions of the ongoing tobacco funds for 2002 and 2004, and all ongoing
tobacco payments from 2005 onwards, are dedicated into the Health Care Access
Fund. $120 million of cigarette and
tobacco tax revenues from 2004 are dedicated to the Health Care Access Fund,
and this amount is adjusted each year based on increases in personal medical
care expenditures.
Auto Tabs
There
are no reductions in auto tabs in this tax bill.
Click on footnote number to
return to text.
[1]
These figures assume a two-parent family of four and a single-parent family of
three. Center on Budget and Policy
Priorities, State Income Tax Burdens on
Low-Income Families in 2000.
[2]
For more on this issue, see our Summary of
Governor Ventura’s Tax Reform Proposal: Impact on Nonprofits.
Updated May 8, 2001
|